Results for 2.19.51.20090625 testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Results for 2.19.51.20090625 testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin

Christian Joensson-2
Windows XP Pro/SP3 cygwin Intel Core2 Duo T9600@2.80GHz system with packages:

binutils             (local build)  2.19.51.20090625 (daily snapshot)
bison                2.3-1          2.3
cloog-ppl            0.15.3-1
cygwin               1.7.0-50
dejagnu              20021217-2     1.4.2.x
expect               20030128-1     5.26
gcc-ada              3.4.4-999
gcc-core             3.4.4-999
gcc-g++              3.4.4-999
gmp                  4.3.1-3
libcloog-devel       0.15.3-1
libgmp-devel         4.3.1-3
libmpfr-devel        2.4.1-4
libppl               0.10.2-1
make                 3.81-2
mpfr                 2.4.1-4
ppl                  0.10.2-1
ppl-devel            0.10.2-1
tcltk                20080420-1     8.4
w32api               3.13-1

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 25 17:08:21 UTC 2009

Native configuration is i686-pc-cygwin

                === binutils tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: objcopy (simple copy)

                === binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes 91
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 1
# of unsupported tests 2
                === gas tests ===


Running target unix

                === gas Summary ===

# of expected passes 211
# of expected failures 1
                === ld tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: cdtest with -Ur

                === ld Summary ===

# of expected passes 90
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 7
# of unsupported tests 2

version: 2.19.51.20090625
Platform: i686-pc-cygwin
configure flags: --enable-shared --enable-static --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Results for 2.19.51.20090625 testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin

Dave Korn-6
Christian Joensson wrote:

> XPASS: objcopy (simple copy)

  See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00445.html!

    cheers,
      DaveK